On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 7:50 AM <pmanank200502@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Manank Patel <pmanank200502@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Fixed unintentional u32 overflow by casting it to u64 before multiplication.
>
> Signed-off-by: Manank Patel <pmanank200502@xxxxxxxxx>
A Fixes tag would be nice to have here.
> ---
> drivers/acpi/acpi_pcc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pcc.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pcc.c
> index ee4ce5ba1fb2..b929d2e5c622 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pcc.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pcc.c
> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ acpi_pcc_address_space_handler(u32 function, acpi_physical_address addr,
> * processor could be much slower to reply. So add an arbitrary
> * amount of wait on top of Nominal.
> */
> - usecs_lat = PCC_CMD_WAIT_RETRIES_NUM * data->pcc_chan->latency;
> + usecs_lat = PCC_CMD_WAIT_RETRIES_NUM * ((u64) data->pcc_chan->latency);
Or redefine PCC_CMD_WAIT_RETRIES_NUM as 500ULL?
> ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&data->done,
> usecs_to_jiffies(usecs_lat));
> if (ret == 0) {
> --
> 2.38.0
>
