On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 12:34:56PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 12:21:25PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > It's not fully correct to take a const parameter pointer to a struct > > and return a non-const pointer to a member of that struct. > > > > Instead, introduce a const version of the dev_fwnode() API which takes > > and returns const pointers and use it where it's applicable. > > > > With this, convert dev_fwnode() to be a macro wrapper on top of const > > and non-const APIs that chooses one based on the type. > > Hmm... it missed the device_get_match_data() implementation (reverse) change > somehow. And it still compiles to me, probably I rebased wrongly and the hunk > went to another patch. I'll investigate and resend as v4 the fixed version. Ah, sorry, I mixed this with previous version of the patch here, so everything is fine in v3! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
