Hi Rafael,
On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 01:54:37PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > I ask as I just went through a large refactoring of the kobject layer to
> > mark many things const * and I find it a bit "sad" that functions like
> > this:
> > static inline struct device *kobj_to_dev(const struct kobject *kobj)
> > {
> > return container_of(kobj, struct device, kobj);
> > }
> > have the ability to take a read-only pointer and spit out a writable one
> > thanks to the pointer math in container_of() with no one being the
> > wiser.
>
> Well, is this really a problem?
>
> After all, if an immutable structure is embedded in another one, that
> doesn't automatically imply that the containing structure has to be
> immutable too. Hence, a const pointer to the inner structure doesn't
> automatically yield a const pointer to the outer one.
I think in that case it'd be better, to at least make an informed decision
on that instead of just dropping the const qualifier.
--
Regards,
Sakari Ailus
