On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 3:38 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 04:29:02PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > This series is about unification on how we handle ACPI _UID when > > it's known to be an integer-in-the-string. > > > > The idea of merging either all via ACPI tree, or taking ACPI stuff > > for the v6.1 while the rest may be picked up later on by respective > > maintainers separately > > >(currently all depends on Wolfram, other > > patches have got the tags from the maintainers). > > I stand corrected, the perf patch is not tagged yet. > > > Partially compile-tested (x86-64). Tentatively applied as 6.1 material. If there are updates, we'll make changes as they go. Thanks!
