On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 9:44 AM Riwen Lu <luriwen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Riwen Lu <luriwen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The freq Qos request would be removed repeatedly if the cpufreq policy
> relates to more than one CPU. Then, it would cause the "called for unknown
> object" warning.
>
> Remove the freq Qos request for each CPU relates to the cpufreq policy,
> instead of removing repeatedly for the last CPU of it.
>
> Fixes: a1bb46c36ce3 ("ACPI: processor: Add QoS requests for all CPUs")
> Reported-by: Jeremy Linton <Jeremy.Linton@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Riwen Lu <luriwen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c
> index db6ac540e924..e534fd49a67e 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c
> @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ void acpi_thermal_cpufreq_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> unsigned int cpu;
>
> for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus) {
> - struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, policy->cpu);
> + struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu);
>
> if (pr)
> freq_qos_remove_request(&pr->thermal_req);
> --
Thanks for fixing my mistake!
I've applied this one instead of the revert of commit 7fdc74da940d, as
6.0-rc material.
