Re: [PATCH PoC 1/3] ACPI / PNP: Don't add enumeration_by_parent devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 19/08/2022 10:59, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
The hisi_lpc driver also creates a platform device serial device for uart,
which is the actual uart which we want to use - see
hisi_lpc_acpi_add_child(). That function does not check
physical_node_count value, but acpi_create_platform_device() does check it.
So if we were to move hisi_lpc_acpi_add_child() across to use
acpi_create_platform_device(), then the change in this patch is required to
not create the PNP binding (so that physical_node_count is not set from
PNP probe).
Hmm... The flag, as I interpret it, is equal to "the device in
question is a peripheral device to the non-discoverable bus, such as
SPI, I2C or UART". I.o.w. I do not see how PNP suits here. So, from my
point of view it seems like an abuse of the flag. Not sure the current
state of affairs in ACPI glue layer regarding this, though.
Sorry, but I'm not following you here. Which flag are you talking about?
"enumerated by parent".

ok, right. So I thought that PNP0501 was a standard cid to describe 16550-compat UART which may be on an LPC bus. And a LPC bus is non-discoverable, like SPI or I2C, which also use "enumerated by parent".

Indeed, using PNP0501 for hisi lpc UART cid would be without problem, apart from the fact that we can't do all the PIO translation (so need "enumerated by parent").

Thanks,
john



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux