On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 09:18:00AM +0200, Marek Behún wrote: > On Mon, 18 Jul 2022 23:48:21 +0300 > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 10:39:42PM +0200, Marek Behún wrote: > > > On Mon, 18 Jul 2022 22:24:09 +0300 > > > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: ... > > > 2. even if there was a problem with name collision, I think the place > > > that needs to be fixed is swnode system. What use are swnodes if > > > they cannot be used like this? > > > > Precisely, that's why I don't want to introduce an API that needs to be fixed. > > Aha, so you want to ensure that root swnodes are created with unique > name? > > Can't we just make it so that named software node must have a parent? That's my proposal, but it might have a downside effect on the existing users (chtwc_int33fe). -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
