On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 11:17:15PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 10:57:55PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 05:01:32PM +0100, Russell King wrote: > > > From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@xxxxxxx> > > > > > > Allow a named software node to be created, which is needed for software > > > nodes for a fixed-link specification for DSA. > > > > In general I have no objection, but what's worrying me is a possibility to > > collide in namespace. With the current code the name is generated based on > > unique IDs, how can we make this one more robust? > > Could you be more clear about the exact concern? Each software node can be created with a name. The hierarchy should be unique, means that there can't be two or more nodes with the same path (like on file system or more specifically here, Device Tree). Allowing to pass names we may end up with the situation when it will be a path collision. Yet, the static names are easier to check, because one may run `git grep ...` or coccinelle script to see what's in the kernel. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
