Re: [net-next: PATCH 08/12] ACPI: scan: prevent double enumeration of MDIO bus children

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



śr., 22 cze 2022 o 14:09 Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> napisał(a):
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 1:05 AM Marcin Wojtas <mw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > pon., 20 cze 2022 o 19:53 Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> napisał(a):
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 05:02:21PM +0200, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
> > > > The MDIO bus is responsible for probing and registering its respective
> > > > children, such as PHYs or other kind of devices.
> > > >
> > > > It is required that ACPI scan code should not enumerate such
> > > > devices, leaving this task for the generic MDIO bus routines,
> > > > which are initiated by the controller driver.
> > > >
> > > > This patch prevents unwanted enumeration of the devices by setting
> > > > 'enumeration_by_parent' flag, depending on whether their parent
> > > > device is a member of a known list of MDIO controllers. For now,
> > > > the Marvell MDIO controllers' IDs are added.
> > >
> > > This flag is used for serial buses that are not self-discoverable. Not sure
> > > about MDIO, but the current usage has a relation to the _CRS. Have you
> > > considered to propose the MdioSerialBus() resource type to ACPI specification?
> > >
> >
> > Indeed, one of the cases checked in the
> > acpi_device_enumeration_by_parent() is checking _CRS (of the bus child
> > device) for being of the serial bus type. Currently I see
> > I2C/SPI/UARTSerialBus resource descriptors in the specification. Since
> > MDIO doesn't seem to require any special description macros like the
> > mentioned ones (for instance see I2CSerialBusV2 [1]), Based on
> > example: dfda4492322ed ("ACPI / scan: Do not enumerate Indirect IO
> > host children"), I thought of similar one perhaps being applicable.
> >
> > Maybe there is some different, more proper solution, I'd be happy to
> > hear from the ACPI Maintainers.
> >
> > [1] https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.4/19_ASL_Reference/ACPI_Source_Language_Reference.html?highlight=i2cserialbus#i2cserialbusterm
>
> Well, the approach based on lists of device IDs is not scalable and
> generally used as the last resort one.
>
> It would be a lot better to have a way of representing connections to
> the MDIO bus as resources in _CRS.

Thank you for your input. I will submit a proposal for MDIOSerialBus
_CRS resource macro then.

Best regards,
Marcin




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux