On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 01:24:51PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 02:15:41PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 10:45:56AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: ... > > I dunno we have a such, but the closest I may imagine is MIPI standardization, > > that we have at least for cameras and sound. > > > > I would suggest to go and work with MIPI for network / DSA / etc area, so > > everybody else will be aware of the standard. > > It is the same argument as for DT. Other OSes and bootloaders seem to > manage digging around in Linux for DT binding documentation. I don't > see why bootloaders and other OSes can not also dig around in Linux > for ACPI binding documentations. > > Ideally, somebody will submit all this for acceptance into ACPI, but > into somebody does, i suspect it will just remain a defacto standard > in Linux. The "bindings" are orthogonal to ACPI specification. It's a vendor / OS / ... specific from ACPI p.o.v. It has an UUID field and each UUID may or may not be a part of any standard. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
