On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 8:46 AM Heikki Krogerus
<heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 03:54:40PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Instead of walking the list of children of an ACPI device directly
> > in order to find the child matching a given bus address, use
> > acpi_find_child_by_adr() for this purpose.
> >
> > Apart from simplifying the code, this will help to eliminate the
> > children list head from struct acpi_device as it is redundant and it
> > is used in questionable ways in some places (in particular, locking is
> > needed for walking the list pointed to it safely, but it is often
> > missing).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/thunderbolt/acpi.c | 9 +--------
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-pm/drivers/thunderbolt/acpi.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/thunderbolt/acpi.c
> > +++ linux-pm/drivers/thunderbolt/acpi.c
> > @@ -304,8 +304,6 @@ static bool tb_acpi_bus_match(struct dev
> > static struct acpi_device *tb_acpi_find_port(struct acpi_device *adev,
> > const struct tb_port *port)
> > {
> > - struct acpi_device *port_adev;
> > -
> > if (!adev)
> > return NULL;
> >
> > @@ -313,12 +311,7 @@ static struct acpi_device *tb_acpi_find_
> > * Device routers exists under the downstream facing USB4 port
> > * of the parent router. Their _ADR is always 0.
> > */
> > - list_for_each_entry(port_adev, &adev->children, node) {
> > - if (acpi_device_adr(port_adev) == port->port)
> > - return port_adev;
> > - }
> > -
> > - return NULL;
> > + return acpi_find_child_by_adr(adev, port->port);
> > }
> >
> > static struct acpi_device *tb_acpi_switch_find_companion(struct tb_switch *sw)
>
> I don't think you need tb_acpi_find_port() anymore. You can just call
> acpi_find_child_by_ard(ACPI_COMPANION(...), port->port) directly, no?
Technically I can, but I thought that the comment in
tb_acpi_find_port() was worth retaining.
