On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 8:40 PM Michael Niewöhner <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The _DSM evaluation warning in its current form is not very helpful, as > it lacks any specific information: > ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM (0x1001) > > Thus, include the UUID of the missing _DSM: > ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-... (0x1001) > > Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Changes in v2: > - fix arguments order > - fix indentation > - drop line break > > drivers/acpi/utils.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/utils.c b/drivers/acpi/utils.c > index d5cedffeeff9..3a9773a09e19 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/utils.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/utils.c > @@ -681,7 +681,7 @@ acpi_evaluate_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const guid_t *guid, u64 rev, u64 func, > > if (ret != AE_NOT_FOUND) > acpi_handle_warn(handle, > - "failed to evaluate _DSM (0x%x)\n", ret); > + "failed to evaluate _DSM %pUb (0x%x)\n", guid, ret); > > return NULL; > } > -- Applied as 5.19 material, thanks!
