[patch 4/7] acpi_pci_irq_find_prt_entry(): use list_for_each_entry() instead of list_for_each()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Matthias Kaehlcke <matthias.kaehlcke@xxxxxxxxx>

acpi_pci_irq_find_prt_entry(): use list_for_each_entry() instead of
list_for_each()

Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <matthias.kaehlcke@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c |    5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff -puN drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c~acpi_pci_irq_find_prt_entry-use-list_for_each_entry-instead-of-list_for_each drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c~acpi_pci_irq_find_prt_entry-use-list_for_each_entry-instead-of-list_for_each
+++ a/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c
@@ -51,10 +51,8 @@ static struct acpi_prt_entry *acpi_pci_i
 							  int bus,
 							  int device, int pin)
 {
-	struct list_head *node = NULL;
 	struct acpi_prt_entry *entry = NULL;
 
-
 	if (!acpi_prt.count)
 		return NULL;
 
@@ -64,8 +62,7 @@ static struct acpi_prt_entry *acpi_pci_i
 	 *
 	 */
 	spin_lock(&acpi_prt_lock);
-	list_for_each(node, &acpi_prt.entries) {
-		entry = list_entry(node, struct acpi_prt_entry, node);
+	list_for_each_entry(entry, &acpi_prt.entries, node) {
 		if ((segment == entry->id.segment)
 		    && (bus == entry->id.bus)
 		    && (device == entry->id.device)
_
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux