2022-05-14 at 16:47, Wolfram Sang wrote: > O >> This series is a subset of the one that was first submitted as a larger >> series to add swnode support [1]. In this one, it will be focused on >> fwnode support only since it seems to have reach a consensus that >> adding fwnode to subsystems makes sense. > > From a high level view, I like this series. Though, it will need Peter's > ack on the I2C mux patches as he is the I2C mux maintainer. Still, I > wonder about the way to upstream the series. Feels like the first 5 > patches should not go via I2C but seperately? Hi Wolfram, I also think it looks basically sane. However, there are a couple of comments plus promises to adjust accordingly. I guess I filed it under "wait for the next iteration"... Cheers, Peter
