On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 08:05:23PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote: ... > > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fwnode)) > > + return -ENOENT; > > + > > ret = fwnode_call_int_op(fwnode, get_reference_args, prop, nargs_prop, > > nargs, index, args); > > + if (ret == 0) > > + return ret; > > > > - if (ret < 0 && !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fwnode) && > > - !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fwnode->secondary)) > > - ret = fwnode_call_int_op(fwnode->secondary, get_reference_args, > > - prop, nargs_prop, nargs, index, args); > > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fwnode->secondary)) > > + return -ENOENT; > > Doesn't this mean you overwrite any return code != 0 with -ENOENT? > Is this intended? Indeed, it would shadow the error code. So, it should go with if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fwnode->secondary)) return ret; then. > In any case: > Tested-by: Michael Walle <michael@xxxxxxxx> Thanks! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko