On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 8:25 PM Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 2022/04/05 3:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 8:25 AM Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> This reverts commit 87ebbb8c612b1214f227ebb8f25442c6d163e802.
> >>
> >> ACPI processor power states can be transitioned in two distinct
> >> situations: 1. when CPU goes idle and 2. before CPU goes offline
> >> ("playing dead") to suspend or hibernate. Case 1 is handled by
> >> acpi_idle_enter or acpi_idle_enter_s2idle. Case 2 is handled by
> >> acpi_idle_play_dead.
> >>
> >> It is necessary to flush CPU caches in case 2 even if it is not
> >> required to transit ACPI processor power states as CPU will go
> >> offline soon. However, the reverted commit incorrectly removed CPU
> >> cache flushing in such a condition.
> >
> > I think what you mean is that the CPU cache must always be flushed in
> > acpi_idle_play_dead(), regardless of the target C-state that is going
> > to be requested, because this is likely to be part of a CPU offline
> > procedure or preparation for entering a system-wide sleep state and
> > the stale cache contents may lead to problems going forward, for
> > example when the CPU is taken back online.
> >
> > If so, I will put the above information into the patch changelog.
>
> I guess it is causing problems because the dirty caches will not get
> written back and the RAM becomes stale if they are not flushed. From my
> understanding, the CPU should have an empty cache and read back contents
> from RAM when it is taken back online.
OK, please see if the changelog I've added to the patch is looking good:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/commit/?h=bleeding-edge&id=dfbba2518aac4204203b0697a894d3b2f80134d3
