On 3/26/22 11:59, Benjamin Stürz wrote:
This replaces comments with C99's designated
initializers because the kernel supports them now.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Stürz <benni@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c | 40 +++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
index 684583955511..3c83a0bfb120 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
@@ -97,26 +97,26 @@ static const struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_slot s_def[] = {
};
static const u32 cxtbl[] = {
- 0xffffffff, /* 0 */
- 0xaaaaaaaa, /* 1 */
- 0x55555555, /* 2 */
- 0x66555555, /* 3 */
- 0x66556655, /* 4 */
- 0x5a5a5a5a, /* 5 */
- 0x5a5a5aaa, /* 6 */
- 0xaa5a5a5a, /* 7 */
- 0x6a5a5a5a, /* 8 */
- 0x6a5a5aaa, /* 9 */
- 0x6a5a6a5a, /* 10 */
- 0x6a5a6aaa, /* 11 */
- 0x6afa5afa, /* 12 */
- 0xaaaa5aaa, /* 13 */
- 0xaaffffaa, /* 14 */
- 0xaa5555aa, /* 15 */
- 0xfafafafa, /* 16 */
- 0xffffddff, /* 17 */
- 0xdaffdaff, /* 18 */
- 0xfafadafa /* 19 */
+ [0] = 0xffffffff,
+ [1] = 0xaaaaaaaa,
+ [2] = 0x55555555,
+ [3] = 0x66555555,
+ [4] = 0x66556655,
+ [5] = 0x5a5a5a5a,
+ [6] = 0x5a5a5aaa,
+ [7] = 0xaa5a5a5a,
+ [8] = 0x6a5a5a5a,
+ [9] = 0x6a5a5aaa,
+ [10] = 0x6a5a6a5a,
+ [11] = 0x6a5a6aaa,
+ [12] = 0x6afa5afa,
+ [13] = 0xaaaa5aaa,
+ [14] = 0xaaffffaa,
+ [15] = 0xaa5555aa,
+ [16] = 0xfafafafa,
+ [17] = 0xffffddff,
+ [18] = 0xdaffdaff,
+ [19] = 0xfafadafa
};
struct rtw89_btc_btf_tlv {
Is this change really necessary? Yes, the entries must be ordered; however, the
comment carries that information at very few extra characters. To me, this patch
looks like unneeded source churn. One other concern is that this driver is
backported to older kernels and older compilers by several distros. Will this
change require adding extra conditional statements to the source used in these
applications?
Larry
