On Friday 25 January 2008 14:20, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > Len, > > Given that there are four cleanup patches in the batch, I didn't even > attempt to bother with checkpatch on anything before the "some checkpatch > fluff" patch. There are, for example, no tab/space problems in the final > thinkpad_acpi.c file. > > After the entire patchset is applied, there are still a few lines over 80 > chars, but that's because they are MUCH more readable the way they are in > that particular hunk of code. > > The braces checkpatch will complain about in the final thinkpad_acpi.c file > are there for good reasons. They are in points of the code where I expect a > maintenance addition of one or two lines could happen, and that means any > such patches would be a lot cleaner. That warning is just weird, anyway. > > There will be also an error about a macro needing do - while. Well, that one > *does not* need it, and it is never used as a function. > > So, please apply the entire set and check the final thinkpad_acpi.c file > with checkpatch --file... It is in *much* better state than what you got > with that checkpatch run: 1 error and 12 warnings, which are all explained > above. > > Patches after the cleanups are checkpatch-clean (except for the details > explained above). applied. thanks Henrique. -Len - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
