[Public] > > Hans, > > > > Do you think you could get one of the folks who reported this regression to > do > > a bisect to see which one "fixed" it? > > We already know which commit is causing the regression. As Rafael already > said the question is why things are not broken in 5.17 and that is not > a straight forward bisect. So figuring this out is going to be a lot > of work and I'm not sure of that it is worth it. I certainly don't > have time to help users with debugging this. > > > If we get lucky we can come down to > > some smaller hunks of code that can come back to stable instead of > reverting. > > 5.17 is almost done and in a couple of weeks Fedora (and Arch and other > distros tracking the mainline kernel) will move to 5.17 resolving the > wakeup by keyboard issue not working there. > > 5.16 is not a LTS kernel, so for other distros we would at a minimum > figure out what needs to be backported to make things work with 5.15 > making the delta / set of possible patches we need even bigger. > So as already said IMHO this is not worth it, at least assuming that > nothing bad happens when attempting wakeup by keyboard, iow it > just does not work and does not put the laptop in some bad state? > > Regards, > > Hans You're right, no bad state as a result and probably not worth the tradeoff for a bisect effort. OK, thanks.
