Hi Rafael
On 01/02/2022 17:58, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
Replace acpi_bus_get_device() that is going to be dropped with
acpi_fetch_acpi_dev().
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c
@@ -626,7 +626,7 @@ static int acpi_coresight_parse_link(str
const union acpi_object *link,
struct coresight_connection *conn)
{
- int rc, dir;
+ int dir;
const union acpi_object *fields;
struct acpi_device *r_adev;
struct device *rdev;
@@ -643,9 +643,9 @@ static int acpi_coresight_parse_link(str
fields[3].type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER)
return -EINVAL;
- rc = acpi_bus_get_device(fields[2].reference.handle, &r_adev);
- if (rc)
- return rc;
+ r_adev = acpi_fetch_acpi_dev(fields[2].reference.handle);
+ if (!r_adev)
+ return -ENODEV;
Is this patch part of a series ? I don't see acpi_fetch_acpi_dev()
in v5.17-rc1, which our tree is based on at the moment. Please could
you point us to the changes ?
Also do you expect to pull this via your tree ?
Cheers
Suzuki
dir = fields[3].integer.value;
if (dir == ACPI_CORESIGHT_LINK_MASTER) {
