RE: [PATCH v5 2/5] drivers: acpi: acpi_apd: Remove unused device property "is-rv"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[Public]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, December 17, 2021 12:07
> To: Pandey, Ajit Kumar <AjitKumar.Pandey@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-clk <linux-clk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> Mukunda, Vijendar <Vijendar.Mukunda@xxxxxxx>; Deucher, Alexander
> <Alexander.Deucher@xxxxxxx>; Hiregoudar, Basavaraj
> <Basavaraj.Hiregoudar@xxxxxxx>; Dommati, Sunil-kumar <Sunil-
> kumar.Dommati@xxxxxxx>; Limonciello, Mario
> <Mario.Limonciello@xxxxxxx>; Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>; Len
> Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>; open list:ACPI <linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; open
> list <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] drivers: acpi: acpi_apd: Remove unused device
> property "is-rv"
> 
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 7:06 PM Ajit Kumar Pandey
> <AjitKumar.Pandey@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Initially "is-rv" device property is added for 48MHz fixed clock
> > support on Raven or RV architecture. It's unused now as we moved
> > to pci device_id based selection to extend such support on other
> > architectures. This change removed unused code from acpi driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ajit Kumar Pandey <AjitKumar.Pandey@xxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <Mario.Limonciello@xxxxxxx>
> 
> Does this or the next patch depend on the rest of the series, or can I
> simply apply them both?

There are (intentional) dependencies within this series on the order.  It
would be better for the whole series to come through one tree.

> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c               | 3 ---
> >  include/linux/platform_data/clk-fch.h | 1 -
> >  2 files changed, 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c
> > index 6e02448d15d9..6913e9712852 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c
> > @@ -87,9 +87,6 @@ static int fch_misc_setup(struct apd_private_data
> *pdata)
> >         if (ret < 0)
> >                 return -ENOENT;
> >
> > -       if (!acpi_dev_get_property(adev, "is-rv", ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER, &obj))
> > -               clk_data->is_rv = obj->integer.value;
> > -
> >         list_for_each_entry(rentry, &resource_list, node) {
> >                 clk_data->base = devm_ioremap(&adev->dev, rentry->res->start,
> >                                               resource_size(rentry->res));
> > diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/clk-fch.h
> b/include/linux/platform_data/clk-fch.h
> > index b9f682459f08..850ca776156d 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/platform_data/clk-fch.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/clk-fch.h
> > @@ -12,7 +12,6 @@
> >
> >  struct fch_clk_data {
> >         void __iomem *base;
> > -       u32 is_rv;
> >  };
> >
> >  #endif /* __CLK_FCH_H */
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux