On Wednesday, 23 of January 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, 23 of January 2008, Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Wed 2008-01-16 13:37:18, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Wednesday, 16 of January 2008, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > On Tue 2008-01-15 23:22:33, Len Brown wrote: > > > > > On Thursday 10 January 2008 19:18, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > Len, > > > > > > > > > > > > Please add the following three patches to the suspend branch. > > > > > > > > > > Applied (and suspend branch has been re-based to latest linus tree) > > > > > > > > Was that "lets reorder notifications, old order was more logical, but > > > > it fixes apm?" series? > > > > > > Yes, plus the docs update from Dave Brownell. > > > > Can we stop that reordering? I do not think it is such a good idea. > > In this particular case it's needed to unbreak the APM emulation and it > certainly is not a good idea to have two different orderings of the notifiers > vs the freezer Sorry, s/notifiers vs the freezer/console switch vs the notifiers/ > (hence the second patch in the series). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
