On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 04:33:29PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote: > I have no obvious objection on either of these two proposals. > But one thing to mention is that > both of these two patches is written on the assumption that the > brightness levels listed in _BCL method are in ascending order, while > this is not stated in the ACPI spec. > Is this a problem? The driver already makes that assumption, and it's implicit in the spec. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
