On 11/23/21 11:06 AM, tanureal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On 11/23/21 4:59 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart
> <pierre-louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>> > +static const struct acpi_device_id cs35l41_acpi_hda_match[] = {
>> > + {"CLSA0100", 0 },
>>
>> I could be wrong but this doesn't look like a legit ACPI _HID?
>>
>> Cirrus Logic can use 'CIR', "CLI", or 'CSC' PNP ID, or an PCI ID.
>>
>> in the past you used
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>> +static const struct acpi_device_id cs35l41_acpi_match[] = {
>> + { "CSC3541", 0 }, /* Cirrus Logic PnP ID + part ID */
>> + {},
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, cs35l41_acpi_match);
>> +#endif
>>
>>
>>
>
> This ACPI _HID is already released, there is nothing I can do about it.
> Future devices will use 'CSC' PnP ID.
ok, add a comment then that you're adding support for an
already-released value that's not compliant.
