On Saturday 19 January 2008 02:54, Dmitry A. Marin wrote:
> Hello! The output of acpidumop is attached. I working with
> 2.6.24-4 kernel now (Ubuntu Hardy (testing)), but if it
> important I can try 2.6.23 as it exist in distribution.
> It seems, that I worked with 2.6.18 5-6 month ago and tried
> some options for booting with another acpi-table (?) and
> don't seen any differnce. Hibirnate and sleep worked well.
>
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:56:30 -0500
> Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sunday 15 July 2007 06:40, Dmitry A. Marin wrote:
> > > System Information
> > > Manufacturer: BenQ
> > > Product Name: Joybook S31
> >
> > Do you notice any functional difference when booting with
> >
> > "acpi_osi=Linux" (default for 2.6.22 and earlier)
> > vs.
> > "acpi_osi=!Linux" (default for 2.6.23 and later)
> >
> > Also, please send me the output from acpidump.
> >
thanks for the acpidump.
OSI(Linux) has no effect on the AML of this machine,
as OSYS is over-written. So I'll just kill the warning
on this box by adding it to the NOP DMI list.
thanks,
-Len
Store (0x07D0, OSYS)
If (CondRefOf (_OSI, Local0))
{
If (_OSI ("Linux"))
{
Store (0x03E8, OSYS)
}
If (_OSI ("Windows 2001"))
{
Store (0x07D1, OSYS)
}
If (_OSI ("Windows 2001 SP1"))
{
Store (0x07D1, OSYS)
}
If (_OSI ("Windows 2001 SP2"))
{
Store (0x07D2, OSYS)
}
If (_OSI ("Windows 2006"))
{
Store (0x07D6, OSYS)
}
If (LAnd (MPEN, LEqual (OSYS, 0x07D1)))
{
TRAP (0x3D)
}
}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
