On Saturday 19 January 2008 02:54, Dmitry A. Marin wrote: > Hello! The output of acpidumop is attached. I working with > 2.6.24-4 kernel now (Ubuntu Hardy (testing)), but if it > important I can try 2.6.23 as it exist in distribution. > It seems, that I worked with 2.6.18 5-6 month ago and tried > some options for booting with another acpi-table (?) and > don't seen any differnce. Hibirnate and sleep worked well. > > On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:56:30 -0500 > Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sunday 15 July 2007 06:40, Dmitry A. Marin wrote: > > > System Information > > > Manufacturer: BenQ > > > Product Name: Joybook S31 > > > > Do you notice any functional difference when booting with > > > > "acpi_osi=Linux" (default for 2.6.22 and earlier) > > vs. > > "acpi_osi=!Linux" (default for 2.6.23 and later) > > > > Also, please send me the output from acpidump. > > thanks for the acpidump. OSI(Linux) has no effect on the AML of this machine, as OSYS is over-written. So I'll just kill the warning on this box by adding it to the NOP DMI list. thanks, -Len Store (0x07D0, OSYS) If (CondRefOf (_OSI, Local0)) { If (_OSI ("Linux")) { Store (0x03E8, OSYS) } If (_OSI ("Windows 2001")) { Store (0x07D1, OSYS) } If (_OSI ("Windows 2001 SP1")) { Store (0x07D1, OSYS) } If (_OSI ("Windows 2001 SP2")) { Store (0x07D2, OSYS) } If (_OSI ("Windows 2006")) { Store (0x07D6, OSYS) } If (LAnd (MPEN, LEqual (OSYS, 0x07D1))) { TRAP (0x3D) } } - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html