Hi Bart, I was just wondering what is the status for this series of patches? Thank you. Asmaa -----Original Message----- From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2021 2:01 PM To: Asmaa Mnebhi <asmaa@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>; open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM <linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>; Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>; Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; David S . Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Rafael J . Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; David Thompson <davthompson@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] gpio: mlxbf2: Introduce proper interrupt handling Importance: High On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 6:48 PM Asmaa Mnebhi <asmaa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This is a follow up on a discussion regarding proper handling of GPIO > interrupts within the gpio-mlxbf2.c driver. > > Link to discussion: > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20210816115953.72533-7-andriy.shevchenk > o@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/ > > Patch 1 adds support to a GPIO IRQ handler in gpio-mlxbf2.c. > Patch 2 is a follow up removal of custom GPIO IRQ handling from the > mlxbf_gige driver and replacing it with a simple IRQ request. The ACPI > table for the mlxbf_gige driver is responsible for instantiating the > PHY GPIO interrupt via GpioInt. > > Andy Shevchenko, could you please review this patch series. > David Miller, could you please ack the changes in the mlxbf_gige > driver. > > v5 vs. v4 patch: > - Remove a fix which check if bgpio_init has failed. > This fix should in a separate patch targeting the stable > branch. > Hi Asmaa! Did you send this fix? I can't find it in my inbox or on patchwork. Bart
