[Public]
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 7:13 PM Mario Limonciello
> <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > The commit ddfd9dcf270c ("ACPI: PM: Add
> acpi_[un]register_wakeup_handler()")
> > added new functions for drivers to use during the s2idle wakeup path, but
> > didn't add stubs for when CONFIG_ACPI wasn't set.
> >
> > Add those stubs in for other drivers to be able to use.
> >
> > Fixes: ddfd9dcf270c ("ACPI: PM: Add acpi_[un]register_wakeup_handler()")
> > Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx>
>
> I need an ACK from an ACPI maintainer to take this with the
> other fix into the pinctrl tree.
>
> Alternatively both can be merged into the ACPI tree.
>
> Should these two patches be tagged for stable?
>
Yes; I think they should be tagged to stable, but only if these come too:
acd47b9f28e55b505aedb842131b40904e151d7c
7e6f8d6f4a42ef9b693ff1b49267c546931d4619
