On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 9:39 AM Kai Song <songkai01@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> It uses IS_ERR to judge the return value of
> pcc_mbox_request_channel().If it is invalid, maybe we should
> use PTR_ERR to get the correct return value.
Either there is a reason to make this change or there isn't.
If there is a reason, then what is it?
> Signed-off-by: Kai Song <songkai01@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> index bd482108310c..0bbb5fa27ce7 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> @@ -503,7 +503,7 @@ static int register_pcc_channel(int pcc_ss_idx)
> if (IS_ERR(pcc_data[pcc_ss_idx]->pcc_channel)) {
> pr_err("Failed to find PCC channel for subspace %d\n",
> pcc_ss_idx);
> - return -ENODEV;
> + return PTR_ERR(pcc_data[pcc_ss_idx]->pcc_channel);
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 2.27.0
>
