Hello Sakari, Thanks for the updated patchset. On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 1:23 PM Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Rajit, > > On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 07:25:27PM -0700, Rajat Jain wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > Now that we have landed the ACPI object for _DSC in the spec: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/CAJZ5v0gwDEjC9T7wfCqDr7R0q_ptz2nVU52_8i8noXHPEign1g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/ > > > > I was wondering what is happening with the corresponding kernel patchset: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20210210230800.30291-1-sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#m24e9f51119cbe6eb39f31c097ea3941d00a0baeb > > > > I didn't see any pending comments, so is there a reason it did not land? > > Thanks for the ping. > > I've rebased the set and switched to _DSC so I believe it is ready to be > merged now: > > <URL:https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/20211018121729.6357-1-sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#t> I have 1 question. I see that these patches change the EEPROM and the camera driver's probe routine to work around a device that is not powered on (in D0 state). I2C core is also not powering it on now if the ACPI says so. So how / when is the device actually getting powered on now (being put in D0 state), after these patches? Thanks, Rajat > > I dropped the ov5670 patch from the set to avoid a conflict, I'll get this > merged through the media tree when the rest have landed there. > > -- > Regards, > > Sakari Ailus
