On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 7:51 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The ACPI_HANDLE() macro is a wrapper arond the ACPI_COMPANION()
> macro and the ACPI handle produced by the former comes from the
> ACPI device object produced by the latter, so it is way more
> straightforward to evaluate the latter directly instead of passing
> the handle produced by the former to acpi_bus_get_device().
>
> Modify pt_gpio_probe() accordingly (no intentional functional impact).
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-amdpt.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/gpio/gpio-amdpt.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/gpio/gpio-amdpt.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/gpio/gpio-amdpt.c
> @@ -72,12 +72,10 @@ static void pt_gpio_free(struct gpio_chi
> static int pt_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> - struct acpi_device *acpi_dev;
> - acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
> struct pt_gpio_chip *pt_gpio;
> int ret = 0;
>
> - if (acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &acpi_dev)) {
> + if (!ACPI_COMPANION(dev)) {
> dev_err(dev, "PT GPIO device node not found\n");
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
>
>
Acked-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx>
