On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 7:56 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > The existing code attempts to "enforce" device links where the > > supplier is a direct ancestor of the consumer (e.g. its parent), which > > is questionable by itself (why do that?) > > In this case, we have an Ethernet switch as the parent device. It > registers an interrupt controller, to the interrupt subsystem. It also > registers an MDIO controller to the MDIO subsystem. The MDIO subsystem > finds the Ethernet PHYs on the MDIO bus, and registers the PHYs to the > PHY subsystem. > > Device tree is then used to glue all the parts together. The PHY has > an interrupt output which is connected to the interrupt controller, > and a standard DT property is used to connect the two. The MACs in the > switch are connected to the PHYs, and standard DT properties are used > to connect them together. So we have a loop. But the driver model does > not have a problem with this, at least not until fw_devlink came > along. As soon as a resource is registered with a subsystem, it can be > used. Where as fw_devlink seems to assume a resource cannot be used > until the driver providing it completes probe. It works at a device level, so it doesn't know about resources. The only information it has is of the "this device may depend on that other device" type and it uses that information to figure out a usable probe ordering for drivers. > Now, we could ignore all these subsystems, re-invent the wheels inside > the switch driver, and then not have suppliers and consumers at all, > it is all internal. But that seems like a bad idea, more wheels, more > bugs. > > So for me, the real fix is that fw_devlink learns that resources are > available as soon as they are registered, not when the provider device > completes probe. Because it doesn't know about individual resources, it cannot really do that. Also if the probe has already started, it may still return -EPROBE_DEFER at any time in theory, so as a rule the dependency is actually known to be satisfied when the probe has successfully completed. However, making children wait for their parents to complete probing is generally artificial, especially in the cases when the children are registered by the parent's driver. So waiting should be an exception in these cases, not a rule.
