Re: [PATCH 1/1] ACPI: tables: FPDT: Do not print FW_BUG message if subtable types are reserved

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 10:56 AM Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2021-08-18 at 14:38 +0800, Adrian Huang wrote:
> > From: Adrian Huang <ahuang12@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Table 5.90 "Runtime Performance Record Types" in ACPI 6.4 spec [1]
> > says:
> >
> >   These type values "0x0003-0xFFFF" of Runtime Performance Record
> > Types
> >   are reserved for ACPI spec usage, platform vendor usage, hardware
> >   vendor usage, platform firmware vendor usage and future use.
> >
> > Users might be confused with the FW_BUG message, and they think this
> > is the FW issue. Here is the example in a Lenovo box:
> >
> >   ACPI: FPDT 0x00000000A820A000 000044 (v01 LENOVO THINKSYS 00000100
> > 01000013)
> >   ACPI: Reserving FPDT table memory at [mem 0xa820a000-0xa820a043]
> >   ACPI FPDT: [Firmware Bug]: Invalid record 4113 found
> >
> > So, remove the FW_BUG message to avoid confusion since those subtable
> > types are reserved in ACPI 6.4 spec.
> >
> > [1]
> > https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.4/05_ACPI_Software_Programming_Model/ACPI_Software_Programming_Model.html#firmware-performance-data-table-fpdt
> >
>
> In
> https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.4/05_ACPI_Software_Programming_Model/ACPI_Software_Programming_Model.html#fpdt-performance-record-types
> it also mentions that "0x0002-0xFFFF" of FPDT Performance Record Types
> are reserved, so it's better to fix them all in one patch?

Ah, I missed that. Will send the v2 patch later.

-- Adrian



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux