Re: [PATCH] Revert "ACPI: resources: Add checks for ACPI IRQ override"

To: rafael@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "ACPI: resources: Add checks for ACPI IRQ override"
From: PGNet Dev <pgnet.dev@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 14:23:39 -0400
Cc: gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hui.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, manuelkrause@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAJZ5v0hkXcouTpF0Hmv9jUwHytOZRz0-T3TYGwzodT0EJYqRjw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20210728151958.15205-1-hui.wang@canonical.com> <YQGA4Kj2Imz44D3k@kroah.com> <CAJZ5v0iKTXSHRU96_xjnh4Zjh4gNfwZs9PusrX3OA059HJNHsw@mail.gmail.com> <a27b6363-e8d3-f9ad-5029-a4a434c6d79b@gmail.com> <CAJZ5v0hkXcouTpF0Hmv9jUwHytOZRz0-T3TYGwzodT0EJYqRjw@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/78.0 Thunderbird/78.12.0

On 7/28/21 12:54 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

Will this revert be auto-magically backported to earlier stable (5.12x/5.13x) trees?


It carries the Cc:stable tag, so it should be picked up automatically.



thx all!

References:
- [PATCH] Revert "ACPI: resources: Add checks for ACPI IRQ override"
  - From: Hui Wang
- Re: [PATCH] Revert "ACPI: resources: Add checks for ACPI IRQ override"
  - From: Greg KH
- Re: [PATCH] Revert "ACPI: resources: Add checks for ACPI IRQ override"
  - From: Rafael J. Wysocki
- Re: [PATCH] Revert "ACPI: resources: Add checks for ACPI IRQ override"
  - From: PGNet Dev
- Re: [PATCH] Revert "ACPI: resources: Add checks for ACPI IRQ override"
  - From: Rafael J. Wysocki