Hi, Rafael, > -----原始邮件----- > 发件人: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> > 发送时间: 2021-07-14 20:30:33 (星期三) > 收件人: "Huacai Chen" <chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxxx> > 抄送: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Len Brown" <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Robert Moore" <robert.moore@xxxxxxxxx>, "Erik Kaneda" <erik.kaneda@xxxxxxxxx>, "ACPI Devel Maling List" <linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "open list:ACPI COMPONENT ARCHITECTURE (ACPICA)" <devel@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Xuefeng Li" <lixuefeng@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Jiaxun Yang" <jiaxun.yang@xxxxxxxxxxx> > 主题: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ACPI: Add LoongArch support for ACPI_PROCESSOR/ACPI_NUMA > > On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 2:41 PM Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > We are preparing to add new Loongson (based on LoongArch, not MIPS) > > support. LoongArch use ACPI other than DT as its boot protocol, so > > add its support for ACPI_PROCESSOR/ACPI_NUMA. > > > > Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 4 ++-- > > drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig | 2 +- > > drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c | 2 +- > > include/linux/acpi.h | 2 +- > > 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig > > index fe0bb6277e4d..90afa44efcba 100644 > > --- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig > > @@ -280,9 +280,9 @@ config ACPI_CPPC_LIB > > > > config ACPI_PROCESSOR > > tristate "Processor" > > - depends on X86 || IA64 || ARM64 > > + depends on X86 || IA64 || ARM64 || LOONGARCH > > select ACPI_PROCESSOR_IDLE > > - select ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS if X86 || IA64 > > + select ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS if X86 || IA64 || LOONGARCH > > default y > > help > > This driver adds support for the ACPI Processor package. It is required > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig > > index fcf2e556d69d..39b1f34c21df 100644 > > --- a/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig > > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ > > config ACPI_NUMA > > bool "NUMA support" > > depends on NUMA > > - depends on (X86 || IA64 || ARM64) > > + depends on (X86 || IA64 || ARM64 || LOONGARCH) > > default y if IA64 || ARM64 > > > > config ACPI_HMAT > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c > > index 6021a1013442..b8795fc49097 100644 > > --- a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c > > @@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ int __init srat_disabled(void) > > return acpi_numa < 0; > > } > > > > -#if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_ARM64) > > +#if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_ARM64) || defined(CONFIG_LOONGARCH) > > /* > > * Callback for SLIT parsing. pxm_to_node() returns NUMA_NO_NODE for > > * I/O localities since SRAT does not list them. I/O localities are > > diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h > > index 6bb36fd6ba31..3ba8511cbede 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/acpi.h > > +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h > > @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ void acpi_table_print_madt_entry (struct acpi_subtable_header *madt); > > /* the following numa functions are architecture-dependent */ > > void acpi_numa_slit_init (struct acpi_table_slit *slit); > > > > -#if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_IA64) > > +#if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_IA64) || defined(CONFIG_LOONGARCH) > > void acpi_numa_processor_affinity_init (struct acpi_srat_cpu_affinity *pa); > > #else > > static inline void > > -- > > Does this patch alone make sense without the other two in the series? > If so, I can queue it up for 5.15, so please let me know. Yes, this patch has no dependency with other two. Huacai > > Thanks! </chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxxx></chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxxx></jiaxun.yang@xxxxxxxxxxx></lixuefeng@xxxxxxxxxxx></devel@xxxxxxxxxx></linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx></erik.kaneda@xxxxxxxxx></robert.moore@xxxxxxxxx></lenb@xxxxxxxxxx></rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx></chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxxx></rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>
