On 29-06-21, 09:47, Ionela Voinescu wrote: > Okay, makes sense. I have not seen this code actually do anything wrong > so far, and the issues I see on ThunderX2 point more to misbehaving > counters for this purpose. This being said, I would have probably > preferred for this feature to be disabled by default, until we've tested > more, but that won't give the chance to anyone else to test. > > Thanks! > > Reviewed-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@xxxxxxx> Thanks for understanding Ionela. -- viresh
