Hello Andy, On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 10:49:42PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > It makes little sense to make PWM flags optional since in case > of multi-channel consumer the flags can be optional only for > the last listed channel. I think the same holds true for dt references. > Thus always require PWM flags to be provided. I'm not sure I want to follow that conclusion. Most consumers only need a single PWM and then not providing flags is fine, isn't it? Or does this change fix an error? Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
