On 18/05/2021 22:48, Kaneda, Erik wrote:
Hi John,
I don't mind looking further if requested.
Someone else reported this as well.
I noticed. By chance, it was my close colleague Xiang Chen.
Could you try the patch below? I think it might help fix this issue..
It looks like the same problem, and you provided the same solution, so
we can look to test it.
Thanks
Thanks,
Erik
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/utdelete.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/utdelete.c
index 624a26794d55..e5ba9795ec69 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/utdelete.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/utdelete.c
@@ -285,6 +285,14 @@ static void acpi_ut_delete_internal_obj(union acpi_operand_object *object)
}
break;
+ case ACPI_TYPE_LOCAL_ADDRESS_HANDLER:
+
+ ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_ALLOCATIONS,
+ "***** Address handler %p\n", object));
+
+ acpi_os_delete_mutex(object->address_space.context_mutex);
+ break;
+
default:
break;