Hi! On Wed 2021-05-05 16:22:07, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 11:36 AM Jonathan Cameron > <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 5 May 2021 09:32:35 +0100 > > Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Tue, 4 May 2021 11:00:52 -0700 > > > Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > +Cc: Paul (I hope you are related to coreboot somehow and can > communicate this further), Pavel and Jacek (LED subsystem suffered > with this as well), Hans, Rafael and linux-acpi@ Thanks for Cc. I prefer @ucw.cz address for the LED work. > > > Dropping the ones we are fairly sure are spurious is even better! > > > > If I get bored I'll just do a scrub of all the instances of this that > > you haven't already cleaned up. It's worth noting that we do > > know some highly suspicious looking entries are out there in the wild. > > I have counted ~60 users of acpi_device_id in IIO. Brief looking at > the IDs themselves rings an alarm about half of them. As far as I can tell, this means asking "is this real ID or did you just invent it" at patch submission. Okay... Best regards, Pavel -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
