RE: [RFC PATCH v2 1/8] ACPICA: IORT: Update for revision E

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
> <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 3:36 AM
> To: Kaneda, Erik <erik.kaneda@xxxxxxxxx>; linux-arm-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; iommu@lists.linux-
> foundation.org; devel@xxxxxxxxxx; Lorenzo Pieralisi
> <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx>; Moore, Robert <robert.moore@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Linuxarm <linuxarm@xxxxxxxxxx>; steven.price@xxxxxxx;
> Sami.Mujawar@xxxxxxx; robin.murphy@xxxxxxx; wanghuiqiang
> <wanghuiqiang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [Devel] Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/8] ACPICA: IORT: Update for revision E
> 
> [+]
> 
> Hi Erik,
> 
> As this is now just merged ino acpica-master and based on the discussion we
> had here,
> 
> https://github.com/acpica/acpica/pull/638
> 
> I had a discussion with ARM folks(Lorenzo) in the linaro-open-discussions call
> and
> can confirm that the IORT Revision E is not the final specification and has
> some issues
> which is now corrected in the latest E.b revision[1]. Also there are no current
> users
> for the Rev E and it may not be a good idea to push this version into the Linux
> kernel
> or elsewhere.
> 
> So could you please revert the merge and I am planning to work on the E.b
> soon.
Hi,

> Please let me know if I need to explicitly send a revert pull request or not.

Please send a revert pull request and I'll remember to not submit Linux-ize the IORT patches.

>From all of the activity that I've seen with the IORT specification, it looks like this table is nontrivial to design and maintain. The difficulty I have with the table is that I do not understand which table revisions are in active use.

So my question is this: which IORT revisions are being actively used?

Thanks,
Erik
> 
> Thanks,
> Shameer
> 
> 1. https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0049/latest/
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: iommu [mailto:iommu-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of
> > Shameer Kolothum
> > Sent: 19 November 2020 12:12
> > To: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devel@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: Linuxarm <linuxarm@xxxxxxxxxx>; steven.price@xxxxxxx;
> Guohanjun
> > (Hanjun Guo) <guohanjun@xxxxxxxxxx>; Sami.Mujawar@xxxxxxx;
> > robin.murphy@xxxxxxx; wanghuiqiang <wanghuiqiang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 1/8] ACPICA: IORT: Update for revision E
> >
> > IORT revision E contains a few additions like,
> >     -Added an identifier field in the node descriptors to aid table
> >      cross-referencing.
> >     -Introduced the Reserved Memory Range(RMR) node. This is used
> >      to describe memory ranges that are used by endpoints and requires
> >      a unity mapping in SMMU.
> >     -Introduced a flag in the RC node to express support for PRI.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum
> <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  include/acpi/actbl2.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/acpi/actbl2.h b/include/acpi/actbl2.h index
> > ec66779cb193..274fce7b5c01 100644
> > --- a/include/acpi/actbl2.h
> > +++ b/include/acpi/actbl2.h
> > @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
> >   * IORT - IO Remapping Table
> >   *
> >   * Conforms to "IO Remapping Table System Software on ARM Platforms",
> > - * Document number: ARM DEN 0049D, March 2018
> > + * Document number: ARM DEN 0049E, June 2020
> >   *
> >
> >
> **********************************************************
> ******
> > **************/
> >
> > @@ -86,7 +86,8 @@ struct acpi_iort_node {
> >  	u8 type;
> >  	u16 length;
> >  	u8 revision;
> > -	u32 reserved;
> > +	u16 reserved;
> > +	u16 identifier;
> >  	u32 mapping_count;
> >  	u32 mapping_offset;
> >  	char node_data[1];
> > @@ -100,7 +101,8 @@ enum acpi_iort_node_type {
> >  	ACPI_IORT_NODE_PCI_ROOT_COMPLEX = 0x02,
> >  	ACPI_IORT_NODE_SMMU = 0x03,
> >  	ACPI_IORT_NODE_SMMU_V3 = 0x04,
> > -	ACPI_IORT_NODE_PMCG = 0x05
> > +	ACPI_IORT_NODE_PMCG = 0x05,
> > +	ACPI_IORT_NODE_RMR = 0x06,
> >  };
> >
> >  struct acpi_iort_id_mapping {
> > @@ -167,10 +169,10 @@ struct acpi_iort_root_complex {
> >  	u8 reserved[3];		/* Reserved, must be zero */
> >  };
> >
> > -/* Values for ats_attribute field above */
> > +/* Masks for ats_attribute field above */
> >
> > -#define ACPI_IORT_ATS_SUPPORTED         0x00000001	/* The root
> > complex supports ATS */
> > -#define ACPI_IORT_ATS_UNSUPPORTED       0x00000000	/* The root
> > complex doesn't support ATS */
> > +#define ACPI_IORT_ATS_SUPPORTED         (1)	/* The root complex
> > supports ATS */
> > +#define ACPI_IORT_PRI_SUPPORTED         (1<<1)	/* The root complex
> > supports PRI */
> >
> >  struct acpi_iort_smmu {
> >  	u64 base_address;	/* SMMU base address */
> > @@ -241,6 +243,17 @@ struct acpi_iort_pmcg {
> >  	u64 page1_base_address;
> >  };
> >
> > +struct acpi_iort_rmr {
> > +	u32 rmr_count;
> > +	u32 rmr_offset;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct acpi_iort_rmr_desc {
> > +	u64 base_address;
> > +	u64 length;
> > +	u32 reserved;
> > +};
> > +
> >
> >
> /**********************************************************
> *****
> > ****************
> >   *
> >   * IVRS - I/O Virtualization Reporting Structure
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > iommu mailing list
> > iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxx
> %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux