On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 07:35:53PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 08:30:30PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Yes, but we have quite a lot of systems working with the current code, so > > I'd like to give them a chance to use the post-1.0 ordering (just in case). > > If the vast majority of systems have never been vendor-tested with the > alternative ordering, then I don't see what it buys us. We've a > demonstrable case here of it causing a regression. I think having a runtime (or config) option will be great. As to what the default should be, I don't have a strong opinion but I must caution that a lot of people have reported issues with suspend/resume on this hardware, including some that mention running windows, so I'm worried about making a decision based only on this hardware - it looks like it's not been tested much on windows either :/ As an example of many other people complaining about suspend I can cite: http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductReview.aspx?Item=N82E16856110057 -- Michel Lespinasse - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
