On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 08:00:25AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 03:35:33PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > It becomes much more when someone does a find /sys. dentries are > > expensive. They eventually can get pruned again, but it's still > > costly to do that. > > Again, if this is a big concern for you, there are better places to look > at for savings. Whoever is proposing a feature has the burden to justify that its usefulness is larger than the overhead/cost it adds. Doesn't seem to be the case with this one so far. And in general ignoring overhead in new features is a pretty sad approach. Big bloat does come in small steps with each new feature. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
