On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 12:16 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > Index: linux/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c > > =================================================================== > > --- linux.orig/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c 2007-11-01 10:54:25.000000000 +0800 > > +++ linux/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c 2007-11-02 09:14:12.000000000 +0800 > > @@ -652,6 +652,35 @@ void ata_acpi_on_resume(struct ata_port > > } > > > > /** > > + * ata_acpi_set_state - set the port power state > > + * @ap: target ATA port > > + * @state: state, on/off > > + * > > + * This function executes the _PS0/_PS3 ACPI method to set the power state. > > + * ACPI spec requires _PS0 when IDE power on and _PS3 when power off > > + */ > > +void ata_acpi_set_state(struct ata_port *ap, pm_message_t state) > > I wouldn't use pm_message_t here. > > We're seriously considering removing it in the future and the caller passes > constants explicitly anyway. > > IMO, it might be cleaner to define two separate functions, one for switching > to D0 and one for switching to D3, and call them as appropriate. Then, you > could get rid of some conditionals below. It doesn't make sense to add a new one just for ata_acpi and we don't misuse pm_message_t here. If you will remove it, lets clean up it then. Thanks, Shaohua - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html