Hi! > > yes, acpidump would be more useful than just the DSDT -- > > as we get all kinds of issues with all the tables. > > > > One problem is that shipping around BIOS images, particularly > > modified ones, is sort of a touchy area. This is the code > > of the manufacturer, who may or may not be happy that the > > community is hacking their code. If any of those manufactureres > > got mad at Intel for mucking with their BIOS code, > > that would be a bad day for we Intel employees. > > > > lesswatts.org is hosted by Intel. So we'd need to > > sort though this issue before adding an acpidump database. > > Well, we have suspend.sf.net and the acpidump database can safely be put in > there, I think. ;-) Agreed. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
