Thomas Renninger wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 19:00 +0100, Andrew wrote:
Hi,
This is probably nothing since there seems to be no ill effects
but I thought someone should know because...well it bothers me.
Heres a diff of the kernel boot log between 2.6.23 and 2.6.24:
scsi4 : pata_amd
scsi5 : pata_amd
-ata5: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x00000000000101f0 ctl 0x00000000000103f6 bmdma
0x000000000001ffa0 irq 14
-ata6: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x0000000000010170 ctl 0x0000000000010376 bmdma
0x000000000001ffa8 irq 15
+ata5: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x1f0 ctl 0x3f6 bmdma 0xffa0 irq 14
+ata6: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x170 ctl 0x376 bmdma 0xffa8 irq 15
+ACPI Exception (exoparg2-0442): AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT, Index (0FFFFFFFF) is beyond end of
object [20070126]
+ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.GTM_] (Node
ffff810002001740), AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT
+ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.CHN1._GTM] (Node
ffff810002001620), AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT
+ata6: ACPI get timing mode failed (AE 0x300d)
ata6.00: ATAPI: HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GSA-4167B, DL13, max UDMA/33
ata6.00: configured for UDMA/33
I doubt the ACPI interpreter broke between those kernels...
Is this the same message as seen when _GTM/_STM were invoked in wrong
order (or the one not invoked at all)?
Tejun might be interested in this one...
ATA ACPI is now turned on by default. It's quite likely that ATA part
of the ACPI table on that machine is broken. Can you try to update the
BIOS?
--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
