On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 16:29 -0400, Len Brown wrote: > On Thursday 25 October 2007 15:24, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote: > > Len Brown wrote: > > > > and going away), and the DSDT databse -- which I believe > > > is also somewhat of a historical artifact. > > > DSDT database or better acpidump.out database might be very useful, > > if could be searched for particular feature -- absence of EC, use of SBS, etc. > > True. > > I don't like the original DSDT database -- it was from an era > when people thought that it was a good idea to hack a DSDT > to workaround Linux failures and share the hacked DSDT > with others. That was a bad strategy and it should be abandoned. > DSDT hacking is for Linux debugging only -- Linux should > always be made to work with an un-modified DSDT. What about plain _crap_ DSDT's like some (mine at least) from HP where there are problems which just can't be fixed without bypassing the DSDT functionality (e.g. lid switches, video extension) and writing a driver specific to that machine's chipset? Even then, some of the issues are in SMI, so can't be fixed, but at least with a hacked DSDT, I can get things mostly working with the new user space. A BIOS would be the _right_ solution, but as the machine is old, that isn't going to happen. > yes, acpidump would be more useful than just the DSDT -- > as we get all kinds of issues with all the tables. > > One problem is that shipping around BIOS images, particularly > modified ones, is sort of a touchy area. This is the code > of the manufacturer, who may or may not be happy that the > community is hacking their code. If any of those manufactureres > got mad at Intel for mucking with their BIOS code, > that would be a bad day for we Intel employees. Aren't most of the BIOS codes based on reference implementations from chipset vendors anyway? If so, I think Intel take the lead here and make their reference BIOS code available publicly. It could be debugged by the community at large, and perhaps we'd end up with derivative works (OEM BIOS) of better quality. Climbing down from the soap box now. Best wishes Peter (who'd reverse engineer and patch his HP BIOS if only he had the assembler-fu to do so). -- Peter Clifton Electrical Engineering Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FA Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
