On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:31:59 +0200 Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx> wrote: > it seems Len's test tree and Linus tree diverged a bit, at least with > this patch set things do not apply cleanly. > > Therefore I post these for discussion whether and in which kernel tree > they should end up before doing work for nothing. > If they are still a candidate for 2.6.24 (rather unintrusive), pls tell > me whether and when I should base them against Len's test/release branch > or whatever other tree. > If not, it would be great if they can be included into the -mm tree and > I can rebase them against this one. I staged the three acpi patches against Len's tree and I staged the hwmon patch against Mark's tree and I staged the I2C patch against Jean's tree. This means that if/when the ACPI patches have gone me->Len->Linus, I can send the I2C patch to Jean and the hwmon patch to Mark and we're all good. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
