On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 08:51:09 +0200 Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello, > > After testing rc8, I noticed that I couldn't power off the computer > directly, it only got halted and I had to press the power button > manually. Just before displaying "System halted", the following message > is displayed: > > ACPI : PCI interrupt for device 0000:02:08.0 disabled > > I had to first revert 5a50fe709d527f31169263e36601dd83446d5744 then > f216cc3748a3a22c2b99390fddcdafa0583791a2 (handling of Sx states) to > recover previous behaviour. Hmm. Those things *do* seem to be suspicious. For example, those commits seem to move code that used to be inside CONFIG_PM (which pretty much *everybody* has) to be inside CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP (which is a totally different thing, and depends on whether the user asked for suspend support or not! Damien - does it work if you ask for SUSPEND or HIBERNATION support? Len - why are you guys moving stuff into CONFIG_PM_SLEEP? I know you seem to think that absolutely *everybody* should always support suspend and hibernation, but the fact is, not everybody does. And it's a totally separate thing for normal ACPI CPU runstate support that people have used to manage a *running* CPU (and shutting it down). Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
