Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, 25 September 2007 16:19, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:15, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>>>> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>>> On Tuesday, 25 September 2007 14:53, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>>>>>> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tuesday, 25 September 2007 14:05, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>>>>>>>> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, 25 September 2007 13:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, 25 September 2007 11:58, Damien Wyart wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, I do not have CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP set,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> because I do not have CONFIG_PM_SLEEP set,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> because I do not want SUSPEND and/or HIBERNATION.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Same answer from my side: I do not have CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP for the same
>>>>>>>>>>>> reason (and this worked fine without them in rc7). I do not think
>>>>>>>>>>>> these settings should have changed between rc7 and rc8.
>>>>>>>>>> Well, we haven't changed much.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Also, another test I just did: on another computer, rc8 is fine
>>>>>>>>>>> regarding ACPI power off, even if CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP is not set. I can
>>>>>>>>>>> provide config if needed.
>>>>>>>>>> On the box that fails to power off, can you please test -rc8 with these two
>>>>>>>>>> commits reverted:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> commit 5a50fe709d527f31169263e36601dd83446d5744
>>>>>>>>>> ACPI: suspend: consolidate handling of Sx states addendum
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> commit f216cc3748a3a22c2b99390fddcdafa0583791a2
>>>>>>>>>> ACPI: suspend: consolidate handling of Sx states.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> and see if it works?
>>>>>>>>> If it does, please test the patch from this message
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119052978117735&w=4
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> on top of vanilla 2.6.23-rc8.
>>>>>>>> You will need one more patch on top of just mentioned one.
>>>>>>> Hm, why did you put acpi_target_sleep_state under CONFIG_SUSPEND?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> CONFIG_HIBERNATION needs acpi_target_sleep_state too.
>>>>>> Agree, attaching updated patch.
>>>>> Well, please use "ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP" instead of
>>>>> "if defined(CONFIG_SUSPEND)||defined(CONFIG_HIBERNATION)",
>>>>> as you did with the second block.
>>>> I was thinking about that, but it seem to be less clear...
>>>> We need this variable only for suspend or hibernation, nothing else.
>>>> with pm_sleep it is not visible at all.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>> Well, PM_SLEEP is defined as (SUSPEND || HIBERNATION), please have a look
>>> at kernel/power/Kconfig, and it was introduced exactly for the conditions like
>>> this.
>> I've seen this then I wrote the patch :) See my point, it is not clear,
>> that PM_SLEEP is equivalent to SUSPEND || HIBERNATION, one needs to
>> grep Kconfig files to find that -- it means that code becomes less readable,
>> and I would like to avoid that.
>
> I see your point. Still, you are using PM_SLEEP in the same file, so someone
> reading the code for the first time will have to find out what it is anyway.
In the second place it depends on header file using PM_SLEEP, so it makes sense.
>
> OTOH, the only function of PM_SLEEP is to be a replacement for
> (SUSPEND || HIBERNATION). It has no other meaning whatsoever.
>
> [Well, sorry, I couldn't invent a better name.]
>
>>> IOW, if we want something to be used for anything else than suspend or
>>> hibernation, it shouldn't be defined under PM_SLEEP.
>> Agree, but we should distinguish there it is better to use PM_SLEEP,
>> and there it is better to use (SUSPEND || HIBERNATION) just to be more expressive...
>
> Well, since PM_SLEEP is used as (SUSPEND || HIBERNATION) everywhere else,
> I think that it would actually be confusing not to use it here. :-)
Ok, patch is here.
Regards,
Alex.
ACPI: suspend: fix ACPI_SLEEP states
From: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/acpi/sleep/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c | 4 ++++
include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h | 4 ----
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sleep/Makefile b/drivers/acpi/sleep/Makefile
index ba9bd40..f1fb888 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/sleep/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep/Makefile
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
obj-y := wakeup.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP) += main.o
+obj-y += main.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP) += proc.o
EXTRA_CFLAGS += $(ACPI_CFLAGS)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c b/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c
index c79edcb..2cbb9aa 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c
@@ -24,7 +24,9 @@
u8 sleep_states[ACPI_S_STATE_COUNT];
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
static u32 acpi_target_sleep_state = ACPI_STATE_S0;
+#endif
int acpi_sleep_prepare(u32 acpi_state)
{
@@ -299,6 +301,7 @@ int acpi_suspend(u32 acpi_state)
return -EINVAL;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
/**
* acpi_pm_device_sleep_state - return preferred power state of ACPI device
* in the system sleep state given by %acpi_target_sleep_state
@@ -373,6 +376,7 @@ int acpi_pm_device_sleep_state(struct device *dev, int wake, int *d_min_p)
*d_min_p = d_min;
return d_max;
}
+#endif
static void acpi_power_off_prepare(void)
{
diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h b/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h
index 202acb9..f85f77a 100644
--- a/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h
+++ b/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h
@@ -147,10 +147,6 @@ static inline void unregister_hotplug_dock_device(acpi_handle handle)
/*--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Suspend/Resume
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
-#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP
extern int acpi_sleep_init(void);
-#else
-static inline int acpi_sleep_init(void) { return 0; }
-#endif
#endif /*__ACPI_DRIVERS_H__*/
