Re: [PATCH] Retain old acpi policy for !CONFIG_CPU_IDLE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I couldn't get this patch to apply.

the current cpuidle branch is rooted at 2.6.22.
I'd like to see a patch on top of that branch
that restores as much of processor_idle.c as possible
to the state in 2.6.22.

ie. a diff of 2.6.22 and cpuidle processor_idle.c
should be as small as possible -- and it is okay
to use a bunch of CONFIG_CPU_IDLE ifdefs to keep things simple.

I can take care of merging that with the other changes
to processor_idle.c that have come along in 2.6.23.

thanks,
-Len


On Thursday 13 September 2007 16:40, Venki Pallipadi wrote:
> 
> Retain the old policy in processor_idle, so that when CPU_IDLE is not
> configured, old C-state policy will still be used. This provides a
> clean gradual migration path from old acpi policy to new cpuidle
> based policy.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Index: linux-2.6.23-rc6/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.23-rc6.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> +++ linux-2.6.23-rc6/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> @@ -65,14 +65,20 @@ ACPI_MODULE_NAME("processor_idle");
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux