On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 12:49:14PM -0400, Len Brown wrote: > > I'd prefer to use "depends on" here, as "select" is sort > of a last resort, given its inherent disfunctionalty > (is that a word?:-) Yes, select is evil as it does not take care of "select" and "depends on" statements of the selected config option. > yes, I wish "select" worked the way programmers want it to, > but it doesn't. Indeed, the only reason using it here is technically > correct is that both these invocations depends on X86 and that > avoids the conflict with !s390 INPUT. Hmm, wasn't especially aware of that. > Also, the reality is that all configs that want these drivers > will have INPUT set already -- something that probably could > not be said of BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE etc. -- so this patch > is really just to please randconfig. Right you are. Randconfig found that one. > Unless you object, I'll just change this to "depends on" when i apply it. No, I don't object. Regards, Andreas - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
